Showing posts with label pier paolo pasolini. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pier paolo pasolini. Show all posts

04 February 2013

January Viewing

swanberg taught filmmaking, garrel expressed love, tashlin somehow managed laughter/
lewis &boetticher taught lighting &about the good ol' american dream/
sono explained family dynamics (again &again), pasolini talked about love &life (&nudity)/
depalma remade hitchcock (w/ more sex), bauer told the future (in the past)/
miyazaki warned about nature, bonello spoke of adolescence (&sexuality)/
&many others 

* Not first viewings
TIER I



TIER II


Vinyl

TIER III




TIER IV



Thinner*  

TRASH



Shorts:

TIER I




TIER II



18 January 2012

The Lost (& last) Pasolini Interview


Read entire interview here

This interview took place three days before Pasolini was murdered in 1975 and was just recently discovered and published (December). It's a wonderful, and short, read in which Pasolini talks passionately about the destruction that consumerism is causing in Italy. Some that is obviously present in Salò. This interview works as a great companionship to the film. Especially to anyone disregarding as pure dementia, shock value, etc. Both the interview and the film express his extreme, almost religious, dislike of what consumerism is doing to Catholics, Marxists, and all of Italy (one could say everywhere now).

About Salò:

In this new film, sex is nothing but an allegory of the commodification of bodies at the hands of power. I think that consumerism manipulates and violates bodies as much as Nazism did. My film represents this sinister coincidence between Nazism and consumerism. Well, I don't know if audiences will grasp this since the film presents itself in rather enigmatic way, almost like a miracle play, where the sacred word retains its Latin meaning of "cursed."

About consumerism:

I consider consumerism a worse fascism than that the classical one, because clerical-fascism did not transform Italians. It did not get into them. It was totalitarian but not totalizing. I'll give you an example: fascism has tried for twenty years to eliminate dialects and it didn't succeed. Consumerism, which, on the contrary, pretends to be safeguarding dialects, is destroying them.